Médias Media Accountability in Austria in Web 2.0 - To What Extent do Blogs, Twitter and Co. Watch, Reflect and Criticize Austrian Journalism
The main question of this paper is, whether the audience in a small country like Austria, which lacks efficient media accountability instruments, is able to bring ethical issues on the agenda by discussing them in blogs, Facebook or on Twitter. How can the audience itself try to keep the media accountable via web tools? Firstly, this issue will be discussed from a theoretical point of view, focusing the audience level. Secondly, I will link the media ethical theoretical approaches with the changes through web 2.0. Thirdly, I will describe the Austrian situation in terms of media accountability. Fourthly, I will present the findings of the expert-interviews, describe the authors’ backgrounds, discuss the motivation and the workflow of the main actors in the field of online media critics and analyze factors of success and problems of their working conditions. One focus will be put on their major problem, the legal situation. Lastly, the analysis will be completed with recent data from the Austrian part of a comparative study on media accountability done in the context FP7-framework research project MediaAcT
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies|
Web: http://www.jurnalism-comunicare.eu/rrjc/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2012:i:2:p:5-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.