IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Discourse Strategies in Media Political Articles. Trustworthy or Fictional Representation of Political Icons in Broadsheets

Listed author(s):
  • Mariana TOCIA


    („Ovidius” University of Constanta)

Registered author(s):

    The present work is a case study or an analysis related to political discourse into the local written media, starting with the pragmatic theories and continuing with discourse related semiotic theories. Our approach starts from the assumption that the journalistic discourse is a power instrument, which distorts the reality, and thus, it creates an illusive media field. Our demonstration is useful as long as it stops at the study of truth and lie into written media. The two newspapers that we chose, Cuget Liber (Free Thinking) and Telegraf (Telegraph), have a different political orientation and they represent a mirror of information and general opinion regarding the events in Dobrogea area and the entire country. The pragmatic outlook allows us to see within the discourse enunciation strategies the real communicational strategies, where the discourse performance is complementary to intentional and activity related values of the speaker. Our attention focuses on meta-discourse research, as a third dimension of the journalistic language. The analysis of media articles shows that, although the political referents are real characters, most of their actions are a fictive media construction. The excessive use of metaphors in broadsheets and the exaggeration of actions related to political referents indicate the distortion of political reality by means of figuring and media theatre.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Download is limited to active subscribers. Subscription information available at:

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii in its journal Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication.

    Volume (Year): (2011)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 5-11

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2011:i:4:p:5-11
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania

    Order Information: Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies
    Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:foj:journl:y:2011:i:4:p:5-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.