IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fma/fmanag/canina96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prime and Score Premia: Evidence Against the Tax-Clientele Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Canina
  • Bruce Tuckman

Abstract

Primes and scores split the cash flows of a share of stock into dividend and capital gain components, respectively. An analysis of the transaction prices reveals that the sum of prime and score prices exceeds the price of the underlying stock. This paper develops a tax-clientele explanation of this premium over the stock price. It test jointly the clientele effect and an after-tax version of the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The data reject this joint hypothesis in a manner that suggest the tax-clientele model is not supported.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Canina & Bruce Tuckman, 1996. "Prime and Score Premia: Evidence Against the Tax-Clientele Hypothesis," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 25(4), Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:canina96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:canina96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Courtney Connors (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.