Using Expectations to Test Asset Pricing Models
Asset pricing models generate predictions relating assets’ expected rates of return and their risk attributes. Most tests of these models have employed realized rates of return as a proxy for expected return. We use analysts’ expected rates of return to examine the relation between these expectations and firm attributes. By assuming that analysts’ expectations are unbiased estimates of market-wide expected rates of return, we can circumvent the use of realized rates of return and provide evidence on the predictions emanating from traditional asset pricing models. We find a positive, robust relation between expected return and market beta and a negative relation between expected return and firm size, consistent with the notion that these are risk factors. We do not find that high book-to-market firms are expected to earn higher returns than low book-to-market firms, inconsistent with the notion that book-to-market is a risk factor.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 34 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (Fall)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.fma.org/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fma:fmanag:bravlehavymichaely05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Courtney Connors)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Courtney Connors to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.