Author
Abstract
This article revisits Sahlins’s discussion of Mauss’s Essay on the Gift, with a focus on its contribution to research on the gift and its broader, social and political implications. Sahlins’s reading of the Essay in Stone Age Economics (1972), we submit, richly buttressed Mauss’s attention to the gift’s “total” significance and its “spiritual” dimensions – even as it developed a new interpretation of the famed Maori notion of hau, or “spirit” of the gift. But it also offered a Hobbesian-inflected, rational and utilitarian rendering of the gift as a form of social contract, which elided the more complex and contradictory facets of gift-exchange that were underscored by Mauss in the Essay on the Gift. No less important, it left the reader wonder how precisely to relate between the gift’s spiritual and contractual dimensions. Recent returns by Sahlins to the topic of the gift indicate a persistent interest in the gift’s “spirit”, while confirming, even enhancing tendencies found in his early writings. Highlighting the anti-Hobbesian and anti-utilitarian effects of one modality of the gift – ‘the gift from everyone to everyone’ – in the sphere of kin-like relatedness in particular, they also pose a contrast to the Essay’s more inclusive vision of the gift’s extensions to all parts of social life, including the state. Building upon Mauss and Sahlins, we need pursue the relation between the “spirit” of gift relations and their “contractual” implications as not only a normative and political but also empirical question, equally pertinent across past and present settings.
Suggested Citation
Philippe Chanial & Ilana F. Silber, 2021.
"Reconciling Spirit and Contract? Marshall Sahlins and the ‘Essai sur le don’,"
Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 55(1), pages 87-106, June.
Handle:
RePEc:fle:journl:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:87-106
DOI: 10.26331/1135
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
- Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fle:journl:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:87-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mario Aldo Cedrini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fleinit.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.