IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedbbr/y2011n11-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A more equitable approach to cutting state aid

Author

Listed:
  • David Coyne
  • Bo Zhao

Abstract

Local governments in New England rely on state aid to finance the provision of essential public services. Yet in response to the recent and ongoing fiscal crisis, state governments across the region have cut local aid deeply, often by the same percentage in each community. This across-the-board approach ignores differences in underlying local fiscal health and places a larger burden on many resource-poor communities. To address this concern, this policy brief provides a new, more equitable approach that allocates smaller aid cuts to communities that are in worse underlying fiscal health and received less existing aid. We use a ?need-capacity gap? to represent underlying fiscal health, which is measured based on local economic and social characteristics outside the direct control of local officials. While we use Massachusetts data on non-school aid to conduct policy simulations, the approach is applicable to many states and aid categories. ; This summarizes the NEPPC working paper 11-2: Designing Formulas for Distributing Reductions in State Aid.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coyne & Bo Zhao, 2011. "A more equitable approach to cutting state aid," New England Public Policy Center Policy Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbbr:y:2011:n:11-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/briefs/2011/briefs112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/briefs/2011/pb112.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbbr:y:2011:n:11-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.