IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedbbr/y2010n10-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming municipal aid in Massachusetts: the case for a gap-based formula

Author

Listed:
  • David Coyne
  • Bo Zhao

Abstract

This policy brief evaluates the distribution of municipal aid in Massachusetts in FY 2011 and suggests an approach for reforming municipal aid without redistributing current aid. We use the ?municipal gap,? a measure that is outside the control of local officials, to determine a community?s need for municipal aid. To show the general pattern of municipal gaps across the state, we compare five prototype communities -- large cities, job-center suburbs, higher-income residential suburbs, rural towns, and resort towns. The analysis shows that the distribution of FY 2011 municipal aid does not closely relate to municipal gaps. A 10-year simulation from FY 2012 to FY 2021 shows that with only modest increases to the aid pool, a gap-based formula can significantly improve the distribution of municipal aid in just a few years. This brief summarizes and expands on analysis in NEPPC working paper 10-4: Does Springfield Receive Its Fair Share of Municipal Aid? Implications for Aid Formula Reform in Massachusetts.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coyne & Bo Zhao, 2010. "Reforming municipal aid in Massachusetts: the case for a gap-based formula," New England Public Policy Center Policy Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbbr:y:2010:n:10-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/briefs/2010/pb102.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neppc/briefs/2010/briefs102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Municipal finance - Massachusetts;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbbr:y:2010:n:10-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.