IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fgv/eaerae/v64y2023i1a90411.html

Actors influence in the definition of institutional logics: An examination of the private health plans’ expenses

Author

Listed:
  • Da Graça, Lia
  • Ryngelblum, Arnaldo L.

Abstract

The definition of which expenses can be incurred in the private health field is an endeavor that involves a dispute between multiple logics. Private health operators in Brazil complain that medical expenses have increased during the last decade in Brazil, as do beneficiaries, who bear the fee readjustments that ensue. The study analyzed how the actors in the private health field influence the configuration of health care expenditures and the elements that interfere, identifying a model of institutional logic that best expresses these definitions in the field.The research is explanatory using archival data and interviews with executives of the organizations in the field. The results showed that the logics compete in the field with a discourse in which each actor understands that the others are responsible for the increase in expenses,and are against data disclosure and transparency to safeguard market competition. This case shows a coalition that is able to exercise its power to manipulate the readjustment of fees, because other actors will rather avoid confrontation in an alternative that does not solve the problem about the sector’s expenses, even with the acknowledgment that it is becoming unsustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Da Graça, Lia & Ryngelblum, Arnaldo L., 2023. "Actors influence in the definition of institutional logics: An examination of the private health plans’ expenses," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 64(1), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:fgv:eaerae:v:64:y:2023:i:1:a:90411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/90411
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fgv:eaerae:v:64:y:2023:i:1:a:90411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Núcleo de Computação da FGV EPGE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eagvfbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.