IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fau/fauart/v72y2022i4p296-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better Environmental Value Using Public Procurement: Evidence from Visegrad Group Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Nemec

    (Technical University of Košice, Faculty of economics, Department of Regional Science and Management, Slovakia)

  • Robert Stefko

    (University of Prešov, Faculty of Management and Business, Department of Marketing and International Trade, Slovakia & AMBIS Vysoká škola s.r.o. Praha)

  • Matus Kubak

    (Technical University of Košice, Faculty of economics, Department of Regional Science and Management, Slovakia)

Abstract

The perception of public procurement has changed over the last decade and gained the role of a strategic tool for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth goals. Environmental considerations in procuring goods, services, and works thus help promote sustainability goals and obtain better environmental value using public funds in the long term perspective. This paper analyses selected determinants' impact on green criteria to award public contracts in the Visegrad Group countries. Using content and regression analysis on an extensive dataset of contract award notices published in Tender Electronic Daily in 2017-2019, we show that green criteria are more prominent in contracts awarded by regional and local contracting authorities, confirming their significant role in fulfilling sustainable development goals on a local and regional level. On the other hand, the relatively low uptake of green award criteria suggests a somehow reserved attitude of contracting authorities towards promoting the environmental requirements by awarding contracts based on the most economically advantageous tender.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Nemec & Robert Stefko & Matus Kubak, 2022. "Better Environmental Value Using Public Procurement: Evidence from Visegrad Group Countries," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 72(4), pages 296-327, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:72:y:2022:i:4:p:296-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.fsv.cuni.cz/mag/article/show/id/1507
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public procurement; Visegrad countries; most economically advantageous tender; green public procurement; sustainable public procurement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • C30 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - General
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:72:y:2022:i:4:p:296-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.