IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Una nota sul disegno dei sistemi pensionistici pubblici: means tested e programmi universali a confronto


  • Marcello D'Amato
  • Mariangela Bonasia


A Note on Social Security Design. Means Tested vs Universal Programs (di Marcello D'Amato) - ABSTRACT: Due to the slowdown of demographic and economic growth in developed countries, it has been argued that universal programs in social security should be replaced by means test programs. This reshuffling of the social security system would achieve a double objective: on the one hand it would protect people in need, on the other hand, by reducing the tax rate, it would allow reducing distortions in choices made by working generations, who will also be able to profit from larger expected returns provided in fully funded systems. With the aim of reconsidering the welfare foundations of the argument provided above, in this paper we extend the basic overlapping generations model provided in Feldstein (1985,1987) to the case of heterogeneous labor income. The results show that, in dynamically efficient economies, the argument has to be considered carefully: equilibrium tax rate in a means tested program is lower than under a universal program as long as the returns warranted by a pay as you go system are sufficiently high so that incentive constraints in the means test programs are binding.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello D'Amato & Mariangela Bonasia, 2003. "Una nota sul disegno dei sistemi pensionistici pubblici: means tested e programmi universali a confronto," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2003(81).
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2003-081007

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info:

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:steste:v:html10.3280/ste2003-081007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.