IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Alternative Routes to Monetary Integration in the British Economic and Political Debate (1989-91)

Listed author(s):
  • Fabio Masini

Nel 1989 il processo di integrazione europea subisce una rapida accelerazione. Il Consiglio Europeo approva Il Rapporto Delors che stabilisce una precisa strategia per il raggiungimento dell’Unione economica e monetaria. Il Governo Britannico cerca di ostacolare l’ipotesi di una moneta unica mettendo sul piatto delle negoziazioni e insinuando nel dibattito scientifico ipotesi alternative: prima a favore di un sistema di concorrenza monetaria e poi di una moneta parallela (l’hard-ecu). Scopo del lavoro è ricostruire il contesto teorico in cui quel dibattito ebbe luogo, sia a livello scientifico sia sulla scena politica

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info:

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by FrancoAngeli Editore in its journal HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY.

Volume (Year): html10.3280/spe2010-001004 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 71-97

in new window

Handle: RePEc:fan:spespe:v:html10.3280/spe2010-001004
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:spespe:v:html10.3280/spe2010-001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.