IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/scresc/vhtml10.3280-scre2005-002005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Planning: too little or too much?

Author

Listed:
  • John Parr

Abstract

Spatial Planning: Too Little or Too Much? (by John B. Parr) - ABSTRACT: Periodically, spatial planning gains an important position on the agenda of those concerned with the management of economic and social change. This tends to be the case in economies of the developed as well as the developing world. Attention is initially given to the nature of spatial planning and to some of the reasons why it might represent a justifiable involvement, both at the level of the nation and the region, where the implications of ignoring these concerns have sometimes been very serious. There is a further set of occasions, however, when spatial planning may be dangerous. Under these circumstances it is common for objectives to be phrased in spatial terms, and for non-spatial (e.g. sectoral or functional) concerns to be subordinated to spatial ones, in such a way that spatial planning assumes an unwarranted dominance in the overall planning process. The consequences of spatial factors exerting such a dominance are no less serious than the consequences of their being neglected. The discussion concludes with an examination of some of the more general difficulties that confront spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • John Parr, 2005. "Spatial Planning: too little or too much?," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2005(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:scresc:v:html10.3280/scre2005-002005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=24553&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David F. Batten, 2011. "The Creative Potential of Network Cities," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. John B Parr, 2015. "Neglected Aspects of Regional Policy: A Retrospective View," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 376-392, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:scresc:v:html10.3280/scre2005-002005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=103 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.