IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

I Contratti di programma per i consorzi di imprese: una valutazione ex-ante

Listed author(s):
  • Marusca De Castris

Incentives to Invest for Consortia of Firms: an ex-ante - Evaluation of Contratti di Programma Objectives The paper presents an ex-ante evaluation of subsidies allocated by Contratti di Programma (CdP) to the consortia of firms in Italy. It is an assessment of the instrument in order to affect the composition of the firms of the consortia and verify if they will co-operate in product or market development. The focus of the paper is the evaluation of three main aspects of the investments generating externalities: the supply chain, the territorial distribution of the initiatives and the product range of all firms inside of the consortia. The general question is if the subsidies lead to a generation of positive externalities for the firms inside the consortium. The theorical analysis suggests that a major concentration of the initiatives in the same region or in the same sector and in the same supply chain can create positive aggregation externalities. Methods and Results The study is based on a statistical analysis of data from administrative archives and official statistics. Data are organized in a database by single initiative. Each initiative is classified by Contratto di Programma, local labour system, economic sector and supply chain. Also investment, public subsidy and new jobs are presented by initiative. Territorial concentration, sectorial and supply chain heterogeneity are measured by a statistical index of concentration and heterogeneity. The results show a strong territorial concentration of investments inside the consortia but also high product heterogeneity. Conclusions Several consortia can ex-ante generate positive externalities through the realisation of their investment and they should be incentivated. On the other hand, exist consortia that generate only weak externalities due to the dispersion of the initiatives inside the region, the economic sector and the supply chain. The incentive to consortia helps to coordinate the investments but it is not always able to bring together firms to co-operate. The results suggest that policy makers should subsidize investment aggregated in consortia only if the coherence and cohesion of the investment is high enough to generate positive externalities.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info:

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by FrancoAngeli Editore in its journal RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO.

Volume (Year): 2008/3 (2008)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 185-206

in new window

Handle: RePEc:fan:restre:v:html10.3280/rest2008-003010
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:restre:v:html10.3280/rest2008-003010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angelo Ventriglia)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.