IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/polipo/vhtml10.3280-poli2001-109002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I fattori di competitivit? dei settori tradizionali italiani: sintesi di un dibattito

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Mazzoni

Abstract

I fattori di competitivit? dei settori tradizionali italiani: sintesi di un dibattito (di Riccardo Mazzoni) - ABSTRACT: Italian sectors of specialization have been characterized over the time by a number of sources of competitive advantages that have been in continuos evolution. This survey aims at providing an overall picture of the main factors that have favoured the competitiveness of our traditional sectors in the past twenty years. Themes such as that the degree of maturity of traditional production as well as the separate contribution of the single firms, of the territorial systems of firms and of the environment in which the firms operate to the degree of competitiveness have been emphasized. These issues have opened the way to the consideration of those processes that originate and create knowledge and of the connections between the building up of skills, knowledge and competitiveness that comes into play. A particular attention has been paid to the "made in italy" industries as they represent the major part of traditional productions. We hope this work will contribute to offer a clearer and more in-depth view of the real prospects opened to Italy on the market of traditional productions.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Mazzoni, 2001. "I fattori di competitivit? dei settori tradizionali italiani: sintesi di un dibattito," ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2001(109).
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:polipo:v:html10.3280/poli2001-109002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=16608&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muscio, Alessandro & Quaglione, Davide & Scarpinato, Michele, 2012. "The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 639-650.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:polipo:v:html10.3280/poli2001-109002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=13 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.