Author
Abstract
Environmental Risk and Social Risk: the Role of the Biotechnological Research in the Construction of the Shareable Security - An instrument for the control of the complexity that is now regaining favour is the redefinition of "rules". The purpose of this redefinition contains a second one in itself: to establish in general if a public Ethic is necessary. The typically polemic expectation, that request of rules emerges on, pertains to the field of both private and public ethic. At the general request of ethically connoted rules, to be meant as an indicative strategy of the action in a horizon of foreseeable risks, corresponds a much widespread awareness that a complex society must rest on the thesis of the Normal Accident, that is, of a normalization of the loss, both human and material. In fact: the normal loss, above all, means a normalization of human loss. The reappearance of the questions that have always followed mankind, now surprise the ethic spring of rules in a phase of disconcerting improbability. The great seasons of moral control of the rapidly increasing social complexity today (for instance Jesuitical casuistry), reintroducing the "moral" fluid medium, show a great weakness. The socio-structural insubstantiality of Ethic shows both the strength and the topicality of the anthropological change we are living, as well as the need to be furnished of instruments of analysis of the human that set aside the scantiness of old mechanical analogies. If the complex society applied only the 40% of the biblical motto "Don?t do onto others what you wouldn?t like to be done to you", this society (ours) couldn?t exist the way it is. Man is no longer the criterion of reference of human actions. Parole Chiave: autoreferenza, complessit?, concetto di societ?, norma sociale, teoria dei sistemi sociali, rapporto tra sociologia ed etica, Codice della Morale. Key Words: Self-reference, Complexity, The Concept of Society, Social Norm, Social System Theory, Evolution of Complexity, Relationship of Sociology and Ethics, The Code of the Moral.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:aimaim:v:html10.3280/aim2008-002004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=122 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.