IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejssjr/76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influences of Managerialism in the Professional Intervention of Social Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Rosa

    (Master of SW, FPCEUC)

  • Helena Neves Almeida

Abstract

Social work, like other professions, has undergone changes in its structural basis, as well as a re-dimensioning of the professional work, which cannot be dissociated from the inevitable administrative reforms of the State and of the social policies themselves. In this research we sought to understand how the state administrative reforms, namely the managerial model of New Public Management have influenced the professional intervention of social workers in the public sector. We did so through the perceptions of the social workers about the implications of managerialism in their professional practices. It is a qualitative research, with exploratory characteristics and was carried out in a municipality in a district of Portugal. It was conducted a semi-structured interview with six social workers in the public sector, from four different sectors: Justice, Local Power, Health and Social Security. After the interviews were collected, a Characterization Grid of the sample and a SWOT Analysis Grid were used for each of the participants to assist the researcher in the Content Analysis of this investigation. The data we analyzed revealed that in all services and intervention areas there was a prevalence of characteristics of managerialism influences, which necessarily induced changes in professional practices. The collected data revealed that there are characteristics of managerialism perceived as beneficial and positive for the professional exercise and other characteristics that have brought constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Rosa & Helena Neves Almeida, 2020. "The Influences of Managerialism in the Professional Intervention of Social Workers," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:76
    DOI: 10.26417/ejss.v3i1.p45-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss/article/view/5227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejss_v3_i1_20/Rosa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejss.v3i1.p45-52?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.