IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/507.html

The Psychology of Policy Resistance: Personality Traits and Teacher Responses to School Calendar Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Muzil Alharbi

    (Department of Education and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafar Al Batin 31991, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mona Muzil Alharbi

    (Department of Curricula and Teaching Methods, Faculty of Education, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafar Al Batin 31991, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nouf Abdullah Alshehri

    (Department of Education and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafar Al Batin 31991, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Naeem Sarwar

    (Department of STEAM Education, Division of Education, University of Education, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan)

Abstract

Large-scale educational reforms are more often defeated at the implementation stage than at the design stage, because the professionals expected to enact them respond to imposed change in systematically different ways. Whether those differences are principally dispositional or principally contextual is a general and unresolved question in the study of policy implementation. This study examines the relationship between teachers' personality traits and resistance to a mandated change in the school calendar, using the transition from a two-semester to a three-semester (trimester) system in Saudi Arabia as an empirical case in which a single reform was imposed simultaneously and uniformly on an entire teaching population. In a cross-sectional correlational survey, 615 primary, middle and secondary school teachers completed the Five Factor Personality Scale and an adapted version of Oreg's (2006) resistance-to-change scale, which distinguishes cognitive, emotional and behavioural resistance. Neuroticism was positively associated with resistance across all three dimensions, whereas extraversion, openness to experience and agreeableness were negatively associated with it; conscientiousness showed no significant association. Female teachers scored significantly higher than male teachers on neuroticism, extraversion and conscientiousness, and secondary school teachers scored higher on extraversion and openness than primary and middle school teachers. Despite these dispositional differences, resistance to the reform differed significantly neither by gender nor by school level. The pattern suggests that although personality shapes how individual teachers experience mandated change, disposition alone does not account for the overall level of resistance a reform encounters; conditions shared across the system appear to exert the stronger influence. Implications are drawn for the sequencing of person-centred and system-level implementation strategies in centralised education systems more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Muzil Alharbi & Mona Muzil Alharbi & Nouf Abdullah Alshehri & Muhammad Naeem Sarwar, 2026. "The Psychology of Policy Resistance: Personality Traits and Teacher Responses to School Calendar Reform," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 13(3), pages 643-669, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:507
    DOI: 10.26417/e5to0ua8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v13_i3_26/Alharbi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/e5to0ua8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.