IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/419.html

Comparative Economic Discourse in Journalism: A Sociological and Educational Perspective on Albanian and Italian Terminology

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Himçi

    (Faculty of Human Sciences, “Aleksandër Xhuvani†University of Elbasan, Albania)

Abstract

This study examines economic discourse in contemporary Albanian journalism, with a comparative focus on Italian terminology. Economic vocabulary, once confined to technical registers, has increasingly entered media language and public communication. The methodology involves analyzing journalistic texts, legal documents, and official publications to identify three lexical levels—terminological, non-terminological, and general—and to explore their interaction in conveying economic information. Findings highlight the role of phraseological units and the influence of Italian and English borrowings in enriching and standardizing Albanian economic terminology. The comparative perspective underscores lexical innovation and cross-linguistic influence, while also revealing challenges of clarity and consistency in specialized discourse. From a social and educational standpoint, the study contributes to understanding how economic language shapes public awareness, supports media literacy, and fosters linguistic competence in interpreting complex economic realities.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Himçi, 2026. "Comparative Economic Discourse in Journalism: A Sociological and Educational Perspective on Albanian and Italian Terminology," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:419
    DOI: 10.26417/05yrsf48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/3431
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v13_i1_26/Himci.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/05yrsf48?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.