IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/402.html

A Philosophical Framework for Analyzing Educational Discourse: The Role of the Elementary Proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Waliye Abuduwayiti

    (Southwest University, Chongqing)

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of elementary propositions within the philosophy of language and reinterprets their relevance for contemporary educational and social-science research. The aim of the study is to demonstrate how the structural features of propositions—such as compositionality, structurality, and intentionality—provide a conceptual framework for analyzing meaning-making in instructional communication and social discourse. The paper employs philosophical analysis as its primary method, using classical theories of propositional form as an analytical lens to explore how meaning is expressed, interpreted, and negotiated in teaching, curriculum design, and institutional communication. The findings show that propositional clarity influences learner comprehension, supports effective instructional design, and reveals how cultural and ideological meanings are embedded in public communication. The study contributes to education and social science by offering a theoretical model that links linguistic structure with practical concerns in pedagogy, discourse analysis, and the representation of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Waliye Abuduwayiti, 2025. "A Philosophical Framework for Analyzing Educational Discourse: The Role of the Elementary Proposition," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:402
    DOI: 10.26417/k220ph61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/3402
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v12_i4_25/Abuduwayiti.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/k220ph61?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.