IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/345.html

Does De Facto Partnership Undermine Marriage? Insights from a Macedonian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Irena Avirovic

    (Faculty of Philosophy)

Abstract

The subject of this work is to examine whether the increased number of de facto partnerships could jeopardize the future of the marital institution in the Republic of Macedonia. The paper will provide existing statistical data on the number of marriages, divorces, and de facto partnerships in the country. Furthermore, it will analyze possible factors which have influenced the increased number of extra-marital communities in Macedonia. For the purposes of this paper we conducted a quantitative research with a sample of 120 respondents aged 18 to 22 years. The questionnaire was outlined to measure the perceptions of young people on marriage and cohabitation. In conclusion, the results from the respondents’ answers were used as an inclusive consideration for future projections and possible major projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena Avirovic, 2024. "Does De Facto Partnership Undermine Marriage? Insights from a Macedonian Case Study," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 11, October -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:345
    DOI: 10.26417/qrmnp608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/59
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v11_i4_24/Avirovic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/qrmnp608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.