IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers' Opinions on Teaching and Assessing Methods in the Life Science Curriculum in the Context of Values

Author

Listed:
  • Cihat YaÅŸaroÄŸlu

Abstract

This research aims to investigate teachers' opinions about teaching and assessing methods that predicted in Life Sciences Course Curriculum (LSCC) in accordance of value education. Survey model was used in this research to achieve this aim. The study population consisted of 155 classroom teachers who serve in city center of Bingöl province, Turkey. An assessment instrument consisting of two chapters and developed by the researcher was used to collect data. The first chapter includes personal information about participants and the second chapter includes items that try to determine recommended teaching and assessing methods in LSSC. Arithmetic means and standard deviation were used for data analysis. It was found that teachers rated teaching and assessing methods proper. It is wished that this study will be useful for teachers, curriculum development specialists and decision makers in education system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cihat YaÅŸaroÄŸlu, 2015. "Teachers' Opinions on Teaching and Assessing Methods in the Life Science Curriculum in the Context of Values," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:130
    DOI: 10.26417/ejser.v3i2.p107-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/6286
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v2_i2_15/Cihat.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejser.v3i2.p107-112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.