Author
Listed:
- Egehan Akbaba
(Sanko Science and Technology High School, Gaziantep, Türkiye)
- Ali Tunç
(Nuray - Tuncay Kara Science and Art Center, Gaziantep, Türkiye)
Abstract
Accurate modeling of photovoltaic array performance under dynamic field conditions is essential for power forecasting and electrical grid integration. Despite the widespread use of five-parameter single-diode models for annual yield estimation, their instantaneous predictive fidelity under operational extremes remains unconstrained. This study evaluates the dynamic accuracy of the standard single-diode framework using a 21-day telemetry dataset (2,909 active daylight observations, plane-of-array irradiance > 50 W/m²) from a 648-module SunPower SPR-327 photovoltaic array (System 1283, Golden, Colorado). All reported voltages and currents are array-level maximum-power-point quantities measured at the inverter DC input. Across all records, the model predicted DC power with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 5.29 kW (5.57%), a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 5.95 kW (6.26%), and a net bias of −3.98 kW (−4.19%). Under high-irradiance conditions (>800 W/m²), with module temperatures predominantly exceeding 55°C, systematic power under-prediction reached −6.29 kW. Error decomposition revealed that current predictions remained accurate to within 0.4% (bias of −1.91 A), while a 3.1% voltage deficit (−12.02 V) drove the power error. Conversely, low-irradiance (50–200 W/m²) discrepancies were highly sensitive to sensor selection, with voltage bias shifting from −0.84 V (reference cell) to +5.11 V (pyranometer). The deficit in high-irradiance voltage prediction points toward physical mechanisms in the voltage domain, such as the model's assumption of a temperature-independent series resistance or standard silicon thermal coefficient adjustments; however, these proposed mechanisms represent hypotheses generated by this analysis rather than confirmed causes. These results isolate the primary source of high-irradiance modeling error and establish target parameters for future calibration.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejms .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.