IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral Reasoning Among Croatian Students of Different Academic Orientations

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Tokić

    (Department of Psychology, Universitiy of Zadar, Croatia)

  • Matilda Nikolić

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that different academic contexts could have different effects on moral development, i.e. in most cases formal education enhances moral reasoning, but sometime erodes it (for example for medical students). The aim of this study was to examine differences in moral reasoning among students of different academic disciplines (health care, law, social sciences and humanities). In research participated 386 students (Mage=23,12): 154 law students, 55 nursing students, 123 other social sciences students, a 53 humanities students. Participants took Test of Moral Reasoning (TMR) (Proroković, 2016) which measures index of moral reasoning (in range from 0 to 1), and idealistic orientations (humanistic and conservative). The results showed that there was no difference in the moral reasoning index among students of different academic orientations. Furthermore, students of different academic disciplines differed in the humanistic orientation in a way that students of social studies were more humanistically oriented than law students. Some of the possible explanations for the lack of differences with regard to academic orientations is that overall stimulating environment that college provides is perhaps more important for moral reasoning development than specific academic contexts. Findings of this study are consistent with the findings of some of the previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Tokić & Matilda Nikolić, 2017. "Moral Reasoning Among Croatian Students of Different Academic Orientations," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:321
    DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v6i2.p208-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms/article/view/5952
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v2_i7_17/Andrea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejms.v6i2.p208-213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.