IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmnjr/13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is the Coverage of Pneumonia Case Detection on Children under Five Years-Old Still Considered as Low in Sleman?

Author

Listed:
  • Ade Kartikasari Sebba

    (Magister Student of Field Epidemiology Training Program, Universitas Gadjah Mada)

  • Baning Rahayujati
  • Isa Dharmawidjaja

Abstract

Pneumonia is one of the deadliest diseases for children under five years-old throughout the world. In Indonesia, pneumonia is the second deadliest disease after diarrhea. In 2015-2016, the Coverage of pneumonia case detection on children under five years-old increased from 22.33 percent to 36.06 percent but it had not achieved the detection target (-85 percent). A program evaluation needs to conduct, consequently. The evaluation aims to observe the implementation of pneumonia investigation program on children under five years-old in Sleman in 2016. The evaluation used a descriptive design performed in June-July 2017. The research subject was the program of Upper Respiratory Infection (ISPA, Infeksi Saluran Pernapasan Akut) implemented in community health centers (puskesmas, pusat kesehatan masyarakat). Twenty respondents as the sample were chosen by using the purposive sampling technique. The surveillance evaluation employed the input, activities, and output. The instruments were structural questionnaires and checklist sheets. The analysis result was presented in forms of tabulation and narration. From the input facet, 100 percent respondents have not had any special trainings related to pneumonia. 55 percent respondents have interlocking jobs with the longest service time of three years or more (75 percent). 70 percent respondents are able to show ARI Soundtimer. There are only 10 percent respondents holding the media of communication, information, and education (KIE, Komunikasi, Informasi, dan Edukasi) in forms of flipchart and leaflet; while 100 percent respondents admit that they have no stamp seal of URI. The proses facet displays that 100 percent respondents do not arrange any plan. The case investigation is only passive (100 percent). 80 percent respondents do socialization of case management and only 15 percent respondents perform a home visit. 100 percent respondents have not held trainings for responsible people, alert villages, and private midwives. From the output facet, the scope of case investigation is still low (36.06 percent).The implementation of pneumonia case investigation program on children under five years-old has been well executed but there are still weaknesses. Hence, public health offices (dinas kesehatan) should improve their human resources by arran ging a training program, equalize the use of breath counting tool and make MoU with all health services to report pneumonia cases. Community health centers are recommended to arrange plans, actively attempt to discover pneumonia cases, and train the responsible people, centers for pre-and postnatal health care (posyandu, pos pelayanan terpadu), or midwives related to the subject of pneumonia.

Suggested Citation

  • Ade Kartikasari Sebba & Baning Rahayujati & Isa Dharmawidjaja, 2019. "Why is the Coverage of Pneumonia Case Detection on Children under Five Years-Old Still Considered as Low in Sleman?," European Journal of Medicine and Natural Scinces Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, July -Dec.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmnjr:13
    DOI: 10.26417/186bpk94m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejmn/article/view/6884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejmn_v2_i2_19/Sebra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/186bpk94m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmnjr:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejmn .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.