IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejisjr/90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The comparison of MCDM Methods including AHP, TOPSIS and MAUT with an Application on Gender Inequality Index

Author

Listed:
  • Latife Sinem Sarul
  • Özge Eren

Abstract

Gender Inequality Index is a major indicator presenting level of development of the countries as Human Development Index, which is calculated regularly every year by UN. In this study, an alternative calculation has been proposed for measuring gender inequality index which is an important barrier for the human development. Each indicator in the index integrated as MAUT- AHP and also AHP-TOPSIS and these methods carried out again for the alternative ranking member and candidate countries of the European Union. The main objective here is to represent that the indicators form gender inequality index can be reclassified with different weights for each indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Latife Sinem Sarul & Özge Eren, 2016. "The comparison of MCDM Methods including AHP, TOPSIS and MAUT with an Application on Gender Inequality Index," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:90
    DOI: 10.26417/ejis.v4i2.p183-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejis/article/view/5494
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejis_v2_i2_16/Latife.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejis.v4i2.p183-196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.