IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejesjr/315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Different Types of Working Hours' Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Titopoulou
  • Ralitsa Ganeva
  • Jeni Staykova
  • Efstathios Titopoulos

Abstract

The variety of existing work schedules offers advantages and disadvantages for workers, as well as for their employers. While some flexibility in working hours is oriented to the needs of workers (beyond the minimum standards required for the protection of the employed), another is focused on meeting the needs of businesses (in the literature concerning the working hours, it is often called “variation†).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Titopoulou & Ralitsa Ganeva & Jeni Staykova & Efstathios Titopoulos, 2019. "Advantages and Disadvantages of the Different Types of Working Hours' Organisation," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:315
    DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v7i1.p199-203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes/article/view/5513
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejes_v5_i3_19/Maria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejes.v7i1.p199-203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svetla Boneva, 2018. "Analysis of the Energy Dependence of the European Union," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, January -.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.