IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eto/stanov/v63y2025i2id704.html

Relationship between Gender equality in household labor, Marital stability and quality

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Šakotić-Kurbalija

    (Odsek za psihologiju, fakultet za Filozofiju, Univerzitet Novi Sad, Srbija)

  • Dragan Kurbalija

    (Agricultural High School with Dormitory Futog, Serbia)

  • Nikolina Kukulj

    (Elementary School „Jovan Sterija Popović“, Vršac, Serbia)

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to examine how important the gender equality in the distribution of household labor is for marital stability and the perception of marital quality. The study included 498 couples from the Republic of Serbia who lived together for a period ranging from 6 months to 57 years and 6 months (M= 14.02, SD= 11.85). The data was collected during 2015 and 2016 as part of a broader research project. Both partners provided responses on the household labor workload, satisfaction with the division of housework, dimensions of marital quality (Dyadic consensus, Dyadic satisfaction, Affectional expression and Dyadic cohesion) and the degree of marital instability. Differences in the household labor workload between women and men were examined using a series of t-tests for dependent samples. The structure of differences between couples who perform housework equally and those in which one spouse mainly performs the majority of work in the degree of satisfaction with the division of housework, assessment of the marital quality and stability was examined using discriminant analysis. The results indicate that the traditional division of household labor is still present in our society and that women are more engaged in housework related to feeding and hygiene, while husbands are more engaged in repair work. Caring for the children, pets, garden and lawn, are household tasks that both spouses are equally engaged in. The results also indicate that an equal distribution of household labor is important for women's satisfaction with the division of housework, and also for the degree of dyadic cohesion and dyadic satisfaction of both spouses. Based on the results, we can assume the existence of different mechanisms that connect the division of household labor, satisfaction with the division of housework, and the quality and stability of the relationship in men and women. The factors that influence satisfaction with the division of household labor in men should be further investigated, since they are not determined by the spouse's actual engagement in the housework.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Šakotić-Kurbalija & Dragan Kurbalija & Nikolina Kukulj, 2025. "Relationship between Gender equality in household labor, Marital stability and quality," Stanovnistvo, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia, vol. 63(2), pages 227-247, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eto:stanov:v:63:y:2025:i:2:id:704
    DOI: 10.59954/stnv.704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV/article/view/704
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV/article/download/704/604
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59954/stnv.704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eto:stanov:v:63:y:2025:i:2:id:704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marko Galjak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.