IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eto/stanov/v58y2020i1id381.html

Value- and reflection-based approach to indicators of Orthodox religiosity of the population

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Lebedev

    (Institute of Social Sciences and Mass Communications, BelGU, Belgorod (Russian Federation))

  • Mirko Blagojević

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade (Serbia))

  • Elena Pokaninova

    (Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow (Russian Federation))

Abstract

In the contemporary sociology of religion that focuses on the study of Orthodox religiosity, especially in Russia and partly in Serbia, there are different theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing the criteria of orthodox religiosity in the population. Two criteria can be identified as paradigmatic cases: the first one could be called the classical or positivist approach and the second one could be named the alternative or phenomenological approach. Researchers who advocate the first approach believe that the criterion of religiosity must include some practical confirmation of the expressed cultural religiosity of the respondents or the population in general. Therefore, it is not enough to identify oneself as a believer or simply align oneself with a particular confessional community. Instead, this subjective position should be confirmed by objective facts such as the regular practice of religious rituals and ceremonies. Proponents of this approach argue that if we do not adhere to this, then the established number of believers is just fictional without any real content, and thus established believers are actually just imaginary believers. For supporters of the phenomenological approach to the criteria of Orthodox religiosity, the crucial criterion is the self-identification of the respondents and their awareness of belonging to a religious or confessional group. Authors of this persuasion do not talk so much about religiosity, but instead introduce the notion of churchiness, which is not a discrete position – nor a fixed current state, like religiosity is considered among the first group of researchers – but a process that begins at a certain point in time and more or less approaches the ideal requirements that a real, profoundly churched, true (Orthodox) believer should fulfil. The authors compare and analyse these approaches in the text, while at the same time presenting the rationale for a third method: the integral value- and reflection-based approach. This approach to the sociological criteria of religiosity is based on concepts of reflection, choice, and context. The criterion of religiosity is proposed as a stable, irreversible intention for immersion of a social actor into a religious context. As such, immersion into the very "core" of religion becomes a basic indicator of a person’s religious value-based orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Lebedev & Mirko Blagojević & Elena Pokaninova, 2020. "Value- and reflection-based approach to indicators of Orthodox religiosity of the population," Stanovnistvo, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia, vol. 58(1), pages 47-61, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eto:stanov:v:58:y:2020:i:1:id:381
    DOI: 10.2298/STNV200322002L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV/article/view/381
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV/article/download/381/359
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2298/STNV200322002L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eto:stanov:v:58:y:2020:i:1:id:381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marko Galjak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stnv.idn.org.rs/STNV .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.