IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etm/ijsrst/v12y2025i3id875.html

Comparative Evaluation of Cloud Pricing Models: Insights from Aws, Microsoft Azure, and GCP

Author

Listed:
  • Ravi Khurana
  • Arashdeep Kaur
  • Kiranpreet Kaur

Abstract

A comparison is made between the pricing strategies of popular cloud platforms, including Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Web Services. The research paper looks at the structure, cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and applicability of several pricing schemes, such as pay-as-you-go, reserved instances, and spot pricing. By highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each model, the research seeks to offer recommendations for strategic planning and ideal cloud cost management through case studies and analytical comparison. Highlighting important cloud computing and associated service companies, such as AWS, Microsoft Azure, and GCP. It outlines study objectives to find and suggest the most effective pricing methods for companies and describes how comparing cloud pricing models can be difficult. According to the results, choosing the appropriate price plan and cloud platform is crucial for cost savings and scalability without sacrificing performance or dependability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravi Khurana & Arashdeep Kaur & Kiranpreet Kaur, 2025. "Comparative Evaluation of Cloud Pricing Models: Insights from Aws, Microsoft Azure, and GCP," International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, Technoscience Academy, vol. 12(3), pages 627-635, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v12:y2025:i3:id:875
    DOI: 10.32628/IJSRST2512368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrst.com/home/article/view/IJSRST2512368
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsrst.com/home/article/download/IJSRST2512368/IJSRST2512368
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/IJSRST2512368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v12:y2025:i3:id:875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrst.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.