IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etm/ijsrst/v12y2025i2id746.html

Comparative Study on the Development of Latent Fingerprints Using Soot Deposition and Black Fingerprint Powder

Author

Listed:
  • C Santhosh
  • Keerthi S

Abstract

The study aids in how effectively black fingerprint powder and soot deposition work to form prints to produces superior ridge clarity and detail a common method is fingerprint powder, but soot deposition is frequently cheap and may use easily accessible materials. Soot deposition might not have as much thorough scientific backing as commercial powders. A methodical investigation offers a scientific foundation for its effectiveness, The present study was conducted to identify which gave well-defined print among these two methods, as a natural byproduct, soot may be less damaging to the environment than some of the synthetic ingredients used in fingerprint powders. Measure the cost efficiency between the soot deposition method and the powdered method. The first approach uses black powder to create fingerprints on a glass surface, whereas the second method uses fire-derived soot. These two techniques have been used to gather and produce a total of 100 samples.

Suggested Citation

  • C Santhosh & Keerthi S, 2025. "Comparative Study on the Development of Latent Fingerprints Using Soot Deposition and Black Fingerprint Powder," International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, Technoscience Academy, vol. 12(2), pages 922-925, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v12:y2025:i2:id:746
    DOI: 10.32628/IJSRST251222638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsrst.com/home/article/view/IJSRST251222638
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsrst.com/home/article/download/IJSRST251222638/IJSRST251222638
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32628/IJSRST251222638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v12:y2025:i2:id:746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrst.com/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.