Author
Listed:
- Richa Shukla
- Nimita Manocha
- Gurmeet Singh Chhabra
Abstract
Under the more general statutory CGMP provisions of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, validation of manufacturing processes is deemed a legal part of current good manufacturing practice for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Validation of manufacturing processes is required by the Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations for finished pharmaceuticals (21 CFR 211.100 and 211.110). A medication should be created that is suitable for its intended purpose, according to the fundamental tenet of quality assurance. Procedure Validation is the collection and estimation of data that proves a process can reliably produce high-quality goods, starting with process design and continuing through commercial production. Three stages of validation are suggested by the 2011 USFDA process validation guideline - Process design, Process qualification, Continued Process qualification. An introduction and broad review of process validation in the pharmaceutical manufacturing process, specifically in the tablet manufacturing process, are provided in this article. Process validation ensures that a process will consistently create a product that meets its predefined quality features and qualities. It is a crucial step in the design, prototyping, and manufacturing processes. Since quality is always a necessary precondition for any product, pharmaceuticals must be produced to the greatest standards of quality. Furthermore, end-product testing does not ensure the product's quality on its own; rather, quality assurance methods need to be applied to incorporate the product's quality throughout the whole process, rather than only testing it at the conclusion.
Suggested Citation
Richa Shukla & Nimita Manocha & Gurmeet Singh Chhabra, 2024.
"Theoretical Approaches to Process Validation in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Process,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, Technoscience Academy, vol. 11(2), pages 573-585, April.
Handle:
RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v11:y2024:i2:id:102
DOI: 10.32628/IJSRST52411229
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etm:ijsrst:v11:y2024:i2:id:102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrst.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.