Author
Listed:
- Najla Mujić
(University of Sarajevo)
Abstract
Purpose – The profitability of green supply chains is the subject of numerous debates, analyses, and studies. While meta-analysis results of previous studies indicate that implementing green supply chain management (GSCM) practices leads to better environmental and economic organizational performance and outcomes, the impact on social and operational performance is contradictory. This study aims to clarify the relative significance of external drivers (coercive, normative, mimetic) versus internal drivers (organizational capabilities) on adopting green supply chain management practices through qualitative analysis. Design/methodology/approach – This study applies the qualitative research methodology and thematic analysis for collecting, analyzing and interpreting data. Primary data are collected using semi structured interviews (n = 6). Key informants are managers in SME BiH, representatives of EU delegations, university professors, public sector representative and key researches in the field of transition to green supply chains in BiH. Findings – The results indicate that, while SMEs in BiH face significant challenges in transitioning to green supply chains, the potential benefits outweigh the barriers. Both internal and external challenges need to be addressed through a combination of strategic initiatives, government interventions, and international collaborations. Internally, companies face financial constraints, lack of expertise, resistance to organizational change, and insufficient investments in sustainable practices. Externally, barriers include underdeveloped markets, regulatory inconsistencies, limited government support, inefficiencies in market mechanisms, information gaps, and inadequate waste management infrastructure. These challenges collectively hinder the adoption of green practices and limit the pace of transition. Research limitations/implications – This study is limited to qualitative insights from a small sample of industry professionals. Future research could expand the sample size and incorporate quantitative methods to validate the findings.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:etl:journl:87
DOI: 10.62900/BHEF242002004
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etl:journl:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Zenica, Faculty of Economics Zenica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bhef.unze.ba/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.