Author
Listed:
- Bruno Bošnjak
- Ševala Isaković-Kaplan
- Lejla Demirović
Abstract
The principle going concern is a fundamental assumption in the preparation and presentation of financial statements. It is a sensitive assessment in audit arrangement that, in the case of an auditor's mistake, can leave multiple negative consequences for the business of the audited entity and its stakeholders, but also for entire accounting profession, and because of that, auditors with caution to access this issue i.e. its emphasis in the audit opinion. There are many factors that affect the auditor's assessment of the assumption of going concern of the audited entity, and in the first row are the items and indicators from the financial statements as a general tool for assessing the financial health of the company. The aim of this paper is to research the positions and indicators of financial statements that auditors can use for the going concern assessment of business entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, given the lack of research of this nature. On a sample of 148 audit reports for 2020 and 2021, the influence of the total assets, financial result of the period, liquidity coefficients, debt and current ratio, as well as the two-year trend of indicators on the auditor's assessment of the going concern of the audited entity were tested. The research showed that a negative business result, a higher debt ratio, a lower liquidity ratio, a lower current ratio and a decline in 3 of the 4 listed indicators increase the probability of emphasizing the issue of going concern in the audit report.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:etl:journl:63
DOI: 10.62900/BHEF242001003
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etl:journl:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Zenica, Faculty of Economics Zenica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bhef.unze.ba/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.