IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etl/journl/100.html

Capital Budgeting And Socio-Economic Analysis: Evidence Of The New Tramway Project: Ilidå½A-Hrasnica

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmin Ademović

Abstract

Capital budgeting is one of the most important areas of financial management. Different techniques are used to evaluate capital investment budgeting projects: payback period (PP), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). Graham and Harvey (2002) point out that financial managers prefer the following methods: internal rate of return or undiscounted payback period. The Ilidža–Hrasnica tram line extension is one of Sarajevo’s most significant transport investments in decades, aiming to connect a long-neglected suburban corridor to the capital’s tram network. This paper evaluates the project’s viability using capital budgeting criteria, Net Present Value (NPV), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR), alongside a qualitative economic justification. The financial analysis, drawing on projected costs and ridership, suggests a positive NPV and an IRR in the 8–10% range, exceeding the relevant cost of capital, indicating the project is financially justified under reasonable assumptions. The results and discussion emphasize that while initial ridership and financial returns may be modest, even negative in the very early years, strategic planning and supportive policies can ensure the project’s long-run success. The study concludes that the Ilidža–Hrasnica tram line is a sound investment that will enhance the city’s sustainable development, and it recommends measures to maximize its inclusive benefits.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:etl:journl:100
DOI: 10.62900/BHEF252102003
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://bhef.unze.ba/article/100
File Function: Journal Article
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62900/BHEF252102003?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etl:journl:100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: University of Zenica, Faculty of Economics Zenica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bhef.unze.ba/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.