Author
Abstract
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping Higher Education and professional practice, demanding critical reflection on its implications for Urban Design education. This viewpoint explores how AI challenges educational models and transforms design practice. In higher education, GenAI offers opportunities for personalized learning and innovative teaching, but raises enormous challenges regarding assessment validity, learners’ intellectual development, and ethics. Within Urban Design, AI is already being used for tasks such as data analysis, image generation, design generation, and optimization. But AI development and adoption have the potential to further transform design, expanding automation and questioning the role of the designer. Drawing on literature, interviews with UK practitioners, and critical reflection, this viewpoint puts forward some reflections about ways in which urban design education may engage with and respond to the emergence of AI. First, institutions must adopt a critically engaged approach, balancing innovation with caution and ethical responsibility. Second, assessment practices require structural redesign to safeguard learning validity while embracing AI’s potential productively. Third, curricula must be updated to integrate critical AI literacy while protecting fundamental design and spatial reasoning skills. Fourth, AI offers potential to enhance teaching and learning. As AI becomes integral to design practice, educators must reimagine pedagogies to ensure graduates are equipped to navigate and shape an AI-augmented urban future. Ultimately, urban design education stands at a crossroads - where the choices made today will determine whether AI enhances or undermines the intellectual and ethical foundations of the discipline.
Suggested Citation
Juliana Martins, 2025.
"Beyond the hype: Reflections on the implications of AI for urban design education,"
Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, Mehmet Topcu, vol. 6(Special I), pages 25-31, December.
Handle:
RePEc:etk:drarch:v:6:y:2025:i:special-issue:id:351
DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6si192
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etk:drarch:v:6:y:2025:i:special-issue:id:351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Havva Alkan Bala, Çukurova University Faculty of Architecture (Çukurova University Faculty of Communication 3rd floor) Saricam / Adana, Türkiye (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://drarch.org/index.php/drarch .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.