IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Rethinking Market Regulation. Policy Lessons from other Disciplines Conclusions

Listed author(s):
  • A. Reitsman
  • S. Raes
  • E. Schieman
  • P. Van Winden
Registered author(s):

    Other disciplines increase our knowledge of when and how markets can be relied on to bring about optimal outcomes. They thereby make a significant contribution to the fine tuning of market regulation policies. Sometimes such fine tuning is in clear focused and well developed information strategies. For instance when limited consumer motivation and limited capacity to discern quality differences between competitors deem policies that simply increase the availability of information less effective; Or in the instance that increased transparency may lead to tacit collusion. Sometimes the fine tuning is in acknowledging that there is scope for increased reliance on implicit contracts or reputation mechanisms and in developing structures to foster such reliance. But most of all perhaps, the studies show that it is not only our understanding of to how to reach the social optimum, but also of what constitutes it, that may need to be regauged.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business, Review of Business and Economic Literature in its journal Review of Business and Economic Literature.

    Volume (Year): XLIX (2004)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 375-385

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20040207
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20040207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (library EBIB)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.