IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2017i15p151-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Assessment of Proofs in Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Kaltrina Zekolli

Abstract

The key of existence and success in all domains of life to the entity of justice is the thorough compliance to the truth and justice. Therefore when a certain right is violated, liable or challenged entrusted to solve that, are the institutions of justice, rather the courts. Courts are competent to find the right path towards the truth applying different methods with intention to satisfy the justice. In this paper special attention we dedicated to the method of open assessment of proofs in litigation, that in fact is the subject of this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaltrina Zekolli, 2017. "Open Assessment of Proofs in Litigation," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 15, pages 151-157, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2017:i:15:p:151-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr15/Academicus-MMXVII-15-151-157.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr15/Academicus-MMXVII-15-151-157.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alma Vokopola & Julejda G�rxhi, 2012. "The Process of Evidencing (Offer of Proof) at Administrative Procedure," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 5, pages 84-95, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2017:i:15:p:151-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.