IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erv/ancoec/y2008i8p49-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstrucción metodológica de la crisis paradigmática en Venezuela

Author

Listed:
  • García Palma, Raúl

Abstract

Within the debate between the paradigms qualitative and quantitative in the investigation of Human Sciences, it arises a historiography of subjects and authors who also oppose metaphors, verbal as much nonverbal. Each metaphor or model of representation has been discussed between, "...ideas that sustain them, attitudes that consolidate it, theory and praxis that it demonstrates to his use and particular ways to make science, to orient processes and to cause historical accomplishments" (Barrera Morales, 2005, P. 90). In the previous observation, it seems to lack how metatheory is constructed to expose what explains how or what it is a methodologic paradigm. "An element is defined not as much reason why it is, but reason why it is not" (Andrade, 2004, p. 103). From this declaration, the previous model is not a metaphor that explains so that of the knowledge, also how weapon. But they exist in the university historiography of Venezuela, authors who work or they approach a model on the methodologic paradigms that are important to distinguish. From this specific weight of the representation on the real human like metaphors, it is that it will be had to approach, through the documentary interpretation, diverse documents or fields.

Suggested Citation

  • García Palma, Raúl, 2008. "Deconstrucción metodológica de la crisis paradigmática en Venezuela," Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar, Entelequia y Grupo Eumed.net (Universidad de Málaga), issue 8, pages 49-60, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:erv:ancoec:y:2008:i:8:p:49-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eumed.net/entelequia/pdf/2008/e08a06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.eumed.net/entelequia/en.art.php?a=08a06
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erv:ancoec:y:2008:i:8:p:49-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisette Villamizar). General contact details of provider: http://www.eumed.net/entelequia/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.