IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i3ap471-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antinomy, Verification, and Technical Training as Key Factors in the World of Trade: The Case of Ceramics

Author

Listed:
  • Ramlani Lina Sinaulan

Abstract

Abuse of authority, in general, is due to the extension of power and authority without being based on the juridical foundation that is the source of such power and authority. A phenomenon of abuse of authority, in relation to a process of verification / technical tracing of ceramic importation activities, has moved from a juridical foundation which is the implementing arrangement of the mandate of Law Number 17 of 2006 on Amendment to Law No. 10/1995 on Customs. Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 72 / M-DAG / PER / 11/2012 concerning Technical Investigation of Ceramic Import contains double norms which gives authority to the Directorate General of Customs and Excise to override legal norms governing the same subject without obligation to Building juridical arguments and alternative solutions. The construction of legal reasoning constructed by the Directorate General of Customs and Excise against decisions taken under the authority of such delegates can not be declared invalid as a decision. However, concrete facts indicate the existence of material losses for ceramic impotation business actors as a result of the synchronization and disharmony of the formulation of legal norms. Thus, the absence of legal protection for importers is particularly vulnerable.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramlani Lina Sinaulan, 2017. "Antinomy, Verification, and Technical Training as Key Factors in the World of Trade: The Case of Ceramics," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4A), pages 471-487.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:471-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-33.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xx:y:2017:i:3a:p:471-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.