IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial4p621-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One Belt, One Road from the Perspective of Funding Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Klecha-Tylec

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to present the investment needs for the implementation of the project, one belt one road, possible sources of its financing, as well as the investments accepted under the initiative. Design/Methodology/Approach: The concept of the New Silk Road connecting Europe and Asia, although officially announced in 2013 at the University of Nazarbayev in Kazakhstan, was created a few years earlier. This study combines related sources to light the initiative form different perspectives. Findings: The conclusion is that the One Belt, One Road route is to ensure connectivity and cooperation within six major economic corridors, which include, the PRC, Mongolia, the Russian Federation, the Indian subcontinent with Pakistan, Central and Western Asia. As a result, the full implementation of the project requires communication in the dimension of several corridors. Practical Implications: From a geopolitical point of view, the New Silk Road is an expression of the PRC's expansion, constituting a Chinese form of globalization, which can be a useful tool for the economic development of the regions involved in this project. Originality/Value: To the author’s knowledge there is not other research presenting the investment needs for the new silk road.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Klecha-Tylec, 2021. "One Belt, One Road from the Perspective of Funding Sources," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 621-633.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:621-633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2793/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Silk road; China; economic corridors.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:621-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.