IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiiy2020i4p748-761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-Crisis Legal Regulation in the COVID-19 Conditions: The System of Restrictions or Creative Legal Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana V. Shatkovskaya
  • Gennady S. Pratsko
  • Irina S. Maslova
  • Zura D. Dinaeva
  • Mikhail M. Kanaev

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to scientifically and critically comprehend the experience of European countries in overcoming the COVID-19 consequences and, on its basis, to construct an optimal model of modern anti-crisis legal regulation. Design/Methodology/Approach: The authors constructed the anti-crisis legal regulation model and studied using the systematic scientific approach and the method of analysis and programming to reconstruct typical patterns of social relations, basing on knowledge about the regulation object and using legal tools and techniques. Through the methods of modeling and reconstruction the authors could develop and substantiate the anti-crisis model structure. In order to determine the national characteristics of the subject, the authors used the comparative legal method as well as statistical, system-structural and functional methods. Findings: As a result of the study, the authors made the conclusions about the essence of the crisis impact caused by the COVID-19 on the mechanism of legal regulation, about the features and principles of anti-crisis legal regulation, in particular, its subject, method, goals and tasks, and means of legal influence. The authors determined the conditionality of the anti-crisis legal regulation model by the initial legal principle underlying it, and the national legal awareness features. The authors prove that total restrictions make the population to overstep law, thereby reduce the authority of the law and trust in the legal bodies, deform legal awareness, violate existing legal relations and relationships. Practical Implications: The results of the study, based on a wide range of empirical data, are necessary for the development of state programs for the business normalization and the economy recovery, as well as for the formation of national strategies for anti-crisis legal regulation and guidelines, recommendations and clear procedures for the public emergency introduction. In particular, the authors proposed to use political and legal programming as a method of legal regulation in a crisis. Originality/Value: The novelty of the article is to develop the structure, models and features of anti-crisis legal regulation in COVID-19 pandemic conditions on the analysis and generalization of the experience of some European countries. The study proves the low effectiveness of the restrictive anti-crisis model of legal regulation in comparison with the creative legal impact both in conditions of a crisis and in overcoming its negative consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana V. Shatkovskaya & Gennady S. Pratsko & Irina S. Maslova & Zura D. Dinaeva & Mikhail M. Kanaev, 2020. "Anti-Crisis Legal Regulation in the COVID-19 Conditions: The System of Restrictions or Creative Legal Impact," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 748-761.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:748-761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijeba.com/journal/625/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T.V. Shatkovskaya & A.A. Solonchenko & Ya.A. Emirsultanov & Yu.A. Naumenko, 2017. "Leading Governments' Legal Initiatives of Innovational Development in the Sphere of Commercialization of Intellectual Products," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 432-442.
    2. T.V. Shatkovskaya & A.A. Solonchenko & Ya.A. Emirsultanov & Yu.A. Naumenko, 2017. "Leading Governments’ Legal Initiatives of Innovational Development in the Sphere of Commercialization of Intellectual Products," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 501-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T.A. Skvortsova & A.A. Nikitina & T.A. Pasikova & A.V. Tagaev, 2019. "Concepts and Сriteria for the Classification of Small and Medium-sized Business in Russia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 417-425.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:special_issue:y:2018:i:1:p:432-442 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. T.A. Skvortsova & G.S. Pratsko & Yu.I. Isakova & E.V. Seregina & V.N. Sevumyan, 2020. "The Economic and Legal Analysis of the Terms of International Delivery Contracts Involving Russian Suppliers," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 395-403.
    4. T.A. Skvortsova & T.A. Mosiyenko & Yu.V. Fedorenko & L.M. Dzyuba, 2018. "Formation and Development of the Legal Regulation of Foreign Investments in Russia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special1), pages 432-442.
    5. T.V. Shatkovskaya & I.A. Isayev & T.V. Epifanova & M.A. Ismailov, 2019. "The Application of Legal-Statistical Method in Analysing Manufacturing Property’s Institutional Development," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 231-242.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Legal regulation; methods of legal influence; anti-crisis model of legal regulation; COVID 19; state of emergency; legal prohibition; legal incentive; permissions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:viii:y:2020:i:4:p:748-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.