IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eri/review/4269-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons Learned or Still High Political Temptation? The Case of Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Otgochuluu Chuluuntseren

    (International Think Tank for Landlocked Developing Countries (ITT for LLDC))

Abstract

Over the last decade Mongolia has navigated stormy global economic and financial times. However, state institutions are still not mature enough to adapt to the free market challenges they face. With its past socialist inertia, Mongolian policy-makers are still dealing with voters who lack modern education on how a liberal state should function. While Mongolia has a young vibrant democracy, this has encouraged short-term election-motivated (even debt fueled) "policies" rather than providing long-term, solid reforms that would encourage healthier state regulation. The biggest lesson for Mongolia is that too much politicization of economic and fiscal issues leads to a cyclical and unstable monetary and budgetary policy. Mongolia should have invested more in public education and policy liberalization to avoid volatility and extreme shifts in its political landscape. Open and participatory policy-making, with stable implementation and routine evaluation can better serve encompassing growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Otgochuluu Chuluuntseren, 2016. "Lessons Learned or Still High Political Temptation? The Case of Mongolia," The Northeast Asian Economic Review, ERINA - Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia, vol. 4(2), pages 69-76, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eri:review:4:2:69-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unii.ac.jp/erina-unp/archive/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/naer42-5_tssc.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eri:review:4:2:69-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hirofumi Arai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erinajp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.