IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/theolo/v2y2022i6id6087.html

The Philosophical Criticism Towards the Scientific Determination of Time-of-Death

Author

Listed:
  • Ranti Putriani

    (Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia)

  • Mohammad Mukhtasar Syamsuddin

    (Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia)

  • Hardono Hadi

    (Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia)

Abstract

Determination of time-of-death is closely related to the mortality criteria. In prehistoric times, the criteria of death were narrated through the event of the body being evacuated from the spirit or soul leaving the human body. Along with the development of science in the modern era, scientists argue the criteria of biological death and clinical death. This study projected to critically philosophically analyze the time-of-death determination related to scientific criteria. The methods used in the data analysis stage were historical, hermeneutic, comparative, and critical reflection. The results showed that the scientific criteria of death were inadequate to be used in the determination of time-of-death. Time-of-death objectively existed as a separate reality outside of human beings and its existence was absolutely determined or influenced by the existence of other realities. Time-of-death ontologically meant the end of life; epistemologically signified the absence of life and had no mysterious nature; axiologically it was a symbol or metaphor of human powerlessness to judge and determine the continuity of life.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:theolo:v:2:y:2022:i:6:id:6087
DOI: 10.24018/theology.2022.2.6.87
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/theology/article/view/6087
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/theology/article/download/6087/855
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/theology.2022.2.6.87?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:theolo:v:2:y:2022:i:6:id:6087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/theology .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.