IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/sport0/v3y2024i1id9131.html

A Validation Study to Assess the Concurrent Validity of the Beep Test as a Proxy for Cardiopulmonary Endurance, Using VO2 Max as the Criterion Standard

Author

Listed:
  • Sameera Peumal Senanayake

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka)

  • Prasangi Dabare

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka)

  • Athige Rajith Nelosan Silva

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka)

  • Sujani Pushpika

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka)

  • Ridmi Maddumage

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

Rowing, characterized as a “velocity-centric sport,” demands high physical and physiological performance. Cardiorespiratory endurance, an integral component of physical fitness, plays a vital role in rowing performance. Optimal physical fitness is essential for injury prevention and success in international competitions. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for assessing maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), a crucial indicator of cardiopulmonary endurance. The considerable expense and specialized expertise required for CPET have prompted the utilization of field tests, such as the beep test. The current study aims to validate the accuracy of the beep test in measuring VO2 max uptake as the gold standard. The present cross-sectional observational study involved 16 participants from the national rowing pool of Sri Lanka (11 males, 5 females). The study adhered to the Bruce protocol for implementing CPET to measure VO2 max. Concurrently, the standardized beep test, encompassing 21 progressively challenging levels, was administered to assess the VO2 max of participants. The number of shuttles completed during the beep test underwent meticulous conversion into corresponding VO2 max values, facilitating a comparative analysis with the VO2 max values derived from CPET. Among the key findings, the CPET among Sri Lankan rowers, male rowers exhibited statistically significant disparities across several vital physiological parameters, including VO2 max, VO2 max at anaerobic threshold (VO2 max AT), maximum heart rate (HR max), and minute ventilation (VE), against their female counterparts. A statistically significant and positive correlation was discerned among female rowers between the VO2 max values obtained through the gold standard CPET and those derived from the beep test. However, a consistent trend emerged, revealing that the beep test consistently overestimated VO2 max in both male and female rowers compared to the gold standard CPET method. The study underscores the importance of considering population-specific factors and advocates for developing refined equations to enhance the accuracy of field tests in predicting cardiopulmonary endurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sameera Peumal Senanayake & Prasangi Dabare & Athige Rajith Nelosan Silva & Sujani Pushpika & Ridmi Maddumage, 2024. "A Validation Study to Assess the Concurrent Validity of the Beep Test as a Proxy for Cardiopulmonary Endurance, Using VO2 Max as the Criterion Standard," European Journal of Sport Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(1), pages 38-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:sport0:v:3:y:2024:i:1:id:9131
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsport.2024.3.1.131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport/article/view/9131
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport/article/download/9131/1606
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsport.2024.3.1.131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:sport0:v:3:y:2024:i:1:id:9131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.