IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/sport0/v2y2023i6id9117.html

Do Between-limb Strength Differences in the Elbow Flexors Affect Their Neuromuscular and Strength Adaptations to Short-term Strength Training?

Author

Listed:
  • Grant S. Rowe

    (School of Psychology, College of Health and Education, Murdoch University, Australia)

  • Anthony J. Blazevich

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Australia)

  • Janet L. Taylor

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Australia)

  • Timothy Pulverenti

    (Department of Anaesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, US)

  • G. Gregory Haff

    (Directorate of Sport, Exercise, and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, UK; Strength and Power Research Group, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Australia)

Abstract

Purpose. The present study quantified between-limb responses to strength training in the stronger (STR) versus weaker (WEA) elbow flexors in participants with symmetric (SYM) or asymmetric (ASY) 1-RM strength. Methods. Neural, hypertrophic and strength adaptations to 4 weeks (3∙wk-1) of unilateral elbow flexion training of both arms were examined in 24 participants (6 men and 6 women in each group) who had not undertaken strength training in the past 12 months. Changes in one-repetition maximum load (1-RM strength), isokinetic (20°·s-1 and 210°·s-1) and isometric (MVIC) strength and rate of force development (RFD) as well as muscle activation (EMG; normalised to maximum M-wave amplitude) and size (CSAFlexor) were measured. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess motor evoked potential amplitude (MEP) and cortical silent period duration (cSP). Results. Following training, significant increases in 1-RM strength (SYM, STR: ∆ = 2.4±1.1 kg, WEA: ∆ = 1.9±1.1 kg; ASY, STR: ∆ = 1.8±0.7 kg, WEA: ∆ = 1.7±0.7 kg) and CSAFlexor (SYM, STR: ∆ = 107±98 mm2, WEA: ∆ = 121±64 mm2; ASY, STR: ∆ = 108±73 mm2, WEA: ∆ = 105±65 mm2) were observed, although they were not different between arms in either group. Increases in isokinetic strength were also detected, but only in STR (SYM: 20°·s-1, 210°·s-1; ASY: 20°·s-1). No statistical changes were detected in MVIC, RFD, EMG, MEP or cSP. Correlation analyses demonstrated both similarities and differences in the between-limb responses when comparing the groups. Conclusion. Between-limb responses to strength training in participants with and without strength symmetry were similar, although isokinetic strength increases were only observed in the stronger arms. However, the correlation results suggest that individual differences exist between the groups, signalling that between-limb responses can differ in individuals with and without strength asymmetry.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant S. Rowe & Anthony J. Blazevich & Janet L. Taylor & Timothy Pulverenti & G. Gregory Haff, 2023. "Do Between-limb Strength Differences in the Elbow Flexors Affect Their Neuromuscular and Strength Adaptations to Short-term Strength Training?," European Journal of Sport Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 42-57, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:sport0:v:2:y:2023:i:6:id:9117
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsport.2023.2.6.117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport/article/view/9117
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport/article/download/9117/1589
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsport.2023.2.6.117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:sport0:v:2:y:2023:i:6:id:9117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/sport .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.