Author
Listed:
- John Egbeazien Oshodi
(Walden University, USA)
Abstract
Public confidence in law enforcement is foundational to democratic stability and institutional legitimacy. Research consistently demonstrates that compliance with the law and cooperation with police are shaped more by perceptions of fairness, dignity, and accountability than by crime outcomes. Yet comparative measurement of these perceptions remains underdeveloped outside of Euro-American contexts. This study introduces the Oshodi Law Enforcement Practices Inventory (OLEPI), a 21-item instrument designed to capture perceptions of policing across Africa, the Caribbean, and the United States. Grounded in procedural justice, institutional legitimacy, and integrity–corruption frameworks, OLEPI organizes perceptions into four domains: community engagement, procedural justice, use of force, and ethics/integrity. A pilot administration (N = 75) in Nigeria, The Bahamas, and the United States revealed that the tool is reliable (Cronbach’s α = .74–.83), feasible, and sensitive to both universal and context-specific concerns. Nigerian participants emphasized corruption and accountability deficits, Bahamians foregrounded fairness and visibility in small-community encounters, and U.S. respondents stressed professionalism, legitimacy, and de-escalation. Across settings, accountability and transparency emerged as global drivers of legitimacy. Tabulated results clarified these cross-national patterns, showing OLEPI’s ability to capture both shared and context-specific pressures. These findings affirm OLEPI’s potential for cross-cultural application, with implications for recruitment, training, policy reform, and community trust-building. The results provide a foundation for Phase II validation, with expanded sampling across Africa and the Caribbean to strengthen cultural responsiveness while preserving global comparability.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:5:y:2025:i:5:id:18620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.