Author
Listed:
- Tèko Augustin Kouevi
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Pascaline Babadankpodji
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Gaïane Naïla Dagnon
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Marin Laured Tossa
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Nathalie Kpéra
(National Institute of Agricultural Research of Benin (INRAB), Republic of Benin)
- Sonagnon Claude-Gervais Assogba
(Faculty of Agronomy (FA), University of Parakou, Republic of Benin)
- Annick Bossou
(Polytechnics College of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC), University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Rose Omari
(Council of Science and Industrial Research; Science, Technology and Policy Research Institute (CSIR-STEPRI), Republic of Ghana)
- Sophie Bogninou
(Polytechnics College of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC), University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Issaka Youssao
(Polytechnics College of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC), University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Cocou Rigobert Tossou
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Pierre Vinasseho Vissoh
(Laboratory for Development, Agricultural Innovation and Rural Communication Dynamics’ Analysis, Department of Economics, Social-Anthropology and Communication for Rural Development (DESAC), of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Générose Vierra-Dalodé
(Department of Nutrition and Food Technology Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
- Sylvie Hounzangbé Adoté
(Department of Animal Production Sciences and Techniques; Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin)
Abstract
Engineering, as well as men’s and women’s valuable labours or contributions, are important for the socioeconomic development of countries. This reality and the lack of data in this field in developing countries brought this paper’s authors to investigate the extent to which female and male students are enrolled and graduate in engineering education faculties in the Republic of Benin, a West African country. To this end, statistics of enrolment, graduation, failure, and exclusion of female and male students of the two oldest engineering education faculties, i.e., the Polytechnics School of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC) and the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences (FSA) of the University of Abomey-Calavi (UAC), have been estimated using Excel software and available enrolment, and academic results’ books and database. Pedagogical bylaws and other education policy documents were also reviewed for the sake of understanding the gender participation trends of the studied faculties. The analysis of almost four decades (1985–2022) of data revealed that very few (about 4,912, including 694 women) students got enrolled in the engineering programmes of the studied faculties. The total number of engineering students enrolled in the two faculties represents less than 1% of the total number of those who got their baccalaureate over the study period. Of the total number of women enrolled over the four decades, about 25% got excluded, while only about 22% of men got excluded at the polytechnic school EPAC. Meanwhile, at the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences FSA, 2% of the women enrolled were excluded against 1% of men. These results show that students are more excluded in the industrial engineering programmes of the polytechnic school compared to the agricultural engineering programmes of FSA. The main reasons identified for the small number of students enrolled in the engineering education faculties were, among others, the limited number of scholarships and places given to the engineering programmes by the government, donors and the faculties due to limitations in infrastructure and other resources available. With regards to the very poor participation of women in engineering programmes, socio-cultural stereotypes, poor social support or care provided to ladies and women, poor gender-responsiveness of STEM education and pedagogies, poor and late information on the advantages of engineering education and careers, sexual harassment, and early pregnancy, are few of the reasons mentioned by interviewees. More advocacy and more gender-responsiveness of further interventions might help improve the overall number of engineering students and the participation of women and other valid but less-represented people in engineering education programmes in universities of the Republic of Benin.
Suggested Citation
Tèko Augustin Kouevi & Pascaline Babadankpodji & Gaïane Naïla Dagnon & Marin Laured Tossa & Nathalie Kpéra & Sonagnon Claude-Gervais Assogba & Annick Bossou & Rose Omari & Sophie Bogninou & Issaka You, 2024.
"Trends of Women’s Participation in Engineering Education in the Republic of Benin and Implications for the Future of Higher Education,"
European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 40-47, January.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:social:v:4:y:2024:i:1:id:18526
DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2024.4.1.526
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:4:y:2024:i:1:id:18526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.