Author
Abstract
This study examines the profound impact of media on shaping public perceptions of brain drain, a globally significant issue with far-reaching implications for politics, society, and the economy, particularly in developing countries such as Albania. Focusing specifically on skilled professionals’ migration in pursuit of enhanced opportunities, the research scrutinizes how media influences their decisions to emigrate, analyzing news coverage and perspectives on migration as factors influencing economic status and quality of life. Against the backdrop of a burgeoning body of scholarly research highlighting the media’s substantial influence on public perceptions and attitudes toward migration, this study contributes by delving into the intricate relationship between media narratives and brain drain perceptions. It examines news coverage and occupation trends, paying special attention to potential stereotypes reinforcing the dichotomy of “skilled leaving” versus “unskilled staying.” The analytical framework integrates concepts from framing, agenda-setting, social constructivism, and critical discourse on globalization perspectives.Empirical data have been collected from a comprehensive sample of 50 Albanian news articles specifically related to brain drain. The synthesis of theoretical approaches and existing scientific studies in this domain complements the data collection. The findings shed light on the media’s capacity to shape perceptions of migration, particularly its influence on professions and quality standards. The study emphasizes the imperative of balanced and objective framing in media discourse to mitigate biases against professionals opting to remain in their home countries. Anticipated contributions include nuanced insights into the complex relationship between media, brain drain, and public perceptions, adding depth to the existing literature.
Suggested Citation
Blerina Gjerazi, 2024.
"Media Influence on Brain Drain Perceptions: An In-Depth Examination of Framing Dynamics,"
European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 59-66, January.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:social:v:4:y:2024:i:1:id:18523
DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2024.4.1.523
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:4:y:2024:i:1:id:18523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.