IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v3y2023i2id18435.html

Medical Disputes on the Concept of Inspanningsverbintenis vs Resultaatsverbintenis: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sulistini Sulistini

    (UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia)

  • Iffatin Nur

    (UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia)

  • Akhyak Akhyak

    (UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia)

Abstract

The relationship between patients and doctors in health services is a therapeutic contract-based relationship. The therapeutic contract begins with an (unwritten) agreement where both parties are assumed to be accommodated when the agreement is reached. Agreement that can be reached include agreeing to medical action or rejecting a medical action plan. Doctors as health workers who work in the health care sector are involved in a working relationship with the hospital as a place to carry out their profession. A doctor working in a hospital also has an administrative relationship that affects rights and obligations between the two parties and responsibilities to third parties. In the relationship between patients and the hospital, patients are the recipient of health services and the hospital is the provider of such services. Hospitals are obliged to provide health services in accordance with health care standards. Doctors, patients and hospitals are in a relationship based on trust, under an assumption that doctors can cure patients' illnesses and will do the best for patients. However, this mindset has changed along with the times, science, and technology that affect the human mind. Their social-moral-oriented relationship has turned into a material-oriented one because doctors face various demands to improve their professionalism. The change in orientation above is one of the causes of medical conflicts and disputes. Conflicts arise between doctors as health service provider and patients as health service receivers. Conflicts can turn into disputes if the party who feels aggrieved has expressed dissatisfaction with the party considered to be the cause. Medical disputes have risen sharply along with the disruption of services amid the turbulence of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout 2020 and 2021. The high rate of disputes also begs question of quality control of health services. This qualitative research-based article attempted to describe and analyze the phenomenon of medical disputes at the Dr. Iskak General Hospital of Tulungagung using the conception of inspanningsverbintenis vs resultaatsverbintenis. The findings show that, in the provision of health services, there may arise four violation categories, namely: ethical violations, disciplinary violations, administrative violations, and legal (both civil and criminal) violations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sulistini Sulistini & Iffatin Nur & Akhyak Akhyak, 2023. "Medical Disputes on the Concept of Inspanningsverbintenis vs Resultaatsverbintenis: A Critical Review," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(2), pages 103-114, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:2:id:18435
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.2.435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18435
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18435/4535
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.2.435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:2:id:18435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.