IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v3y2023i1id18398.html

The Differences of The Feeling Case in Romantic Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Fatih Bal

    (Sakarya University, Turkey)

Abstract

This research aims to examine emotional differences in romantic relationships. The relational screening model used this research. The population of this research consists of adult individuals living in Istanbul. The sample of the study consists of 600 adult individuals selected by random sampling method among these individuals. This study used the Demographic Information Form, Relationship Rating Scale, and Mood State Adjective Pairs List as data collection tools. Significant differences between the Relationship Rating Scale and the Mood State Adjective Pairs List were found between meaningful relationships and gender variables. In addition, it was determined that the Mood Pairs List Relationship Evaluation Scale predicted significantly, and Mood Pairs List Relationship Evaluation Scale explained 97.1% of the total variance. According to beta coefficient values, it was found that the variable that describes the effect of relationship satisfaction the most is Joyful-Sad.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatih Bal, 2023. "The Differences of The Feeling Case in Romantic Relations," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(1), pages 76-90, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:18398
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18398
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18398/4521
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:18398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.